The BGS is working with industry and academia to develop geoscience tools for strategic railway planning and performance monitoring.
Efficient rail performance requires that constant and level rail track geometry be maintained. The geotechnical properties of the subgrade exert huge control over the performance of our railway network. Efficient running of the existing network and plans to upgrade operational and abandoned infrastructure are high on the agenda. Now, more than ever, the rail network urgently needs fundamental research into the performance and properties of the subgrade particularly within drift geology and engineered structures constructed in Victorian times. While much data can be gathered using traditional site investigation methods, the BGS is actively involved in developing new techniques to measure and assess subgrade properties for the benefit of the whole network.
Our Railway Geotechnics and Geophysics Team offers services covering:

Investigation techniques at research sites such as Leominster and East Leake include:

Research and partnerships
The BGS is leading teams including the Great
Central Railway (Nottingham) Ltd., the Nottingham
Transport Heritage Centre, and the Railway
Research Centre at Birmingham University in the management of
railway research sites where new methods are evaluated.
Railway research sites
At Leominster our team is pioneering new techniques to measure dynamic
loads from rail traffic. A vibration amplification phenomenon has
been detected that has significant implications for the subgrade
problems that develop due to repeated traffic loading. Increased
vibrations detected deep within the subgrade are shedding new light
on the processes by which fine-grained material is transported
into the ballast.

Dynamic load from a dual carriage DMU in subgrade showing load
increase with depth in poorly drained alluvial soil, resulting in
migration of fines into the ballast from soft clay at the top of
the subgrade.
At East Leake, Notts our team is developing new techniques to characterise the condition and performance of engineered embankments. We've combined traditional site investigation techniques with new advances in resistivity surveying and continuous surface wave surveys, and are pioneering new applications of microtremor studies to investigate the distribution and variability in the geotechnical properties of engineered fill.

Comparison of the stiffness and friction ratio of the ballast,
underlying fill and the geological formation (deeper than 5.5 m ).
The shallow interval of higher stiffness / lower friction ratio lens
from station 40 m is due to a change from clay to sand and gravel
fill materials.
3D geospatial models for route appraisals:
Network maintenance programmes can be improved with better integration
of geological data from regional to site scales. Attributed data
now held in 3D geospatial databases can be combined in rating schemes
designed to identify areas where ground conditions are difficult
and likely to cause subgrade problems. Studies undertaken in Manchester,
London and Glasgow, where 3D models already exist, show the relevance
of this approach for linear route appraisal.
These studies produce:

Geological and engineering geological linear route assessment related
to track geometry.
Images contain OS topography © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Licence number 100017897/2006
Selected Publications
Gunn, D A, Jackson, P D, Entwisle, D C, Armstrong, R W, and Culshaw, M G. 2003. Predicting subgrade shear modulus from existing ground models. NDT&E Int. 36, (3), 135-144.
Gunn, D A, Nelder, L M, Jackson, P, Entwisle, D, Stirling, A B, Konstantelias, S, Lewis, R W, and Kingham, P. 2004. Geophysical inspection of the trackbed-subgrade stiffness and performance. 7th Int. Conf. Railway Engineering.
Gunn, D A, and Stirling A B. 2004. Geophysical trackbed and subgrade monitoring at Leominster Station. Rail Technology Magazine, 4, (6), pp 34-37.
Gunn, D A, Nelder, L M, Chambers, J E, Reeves, H, Freeborough, K, Jackson, P, Stirling, A B, and Brough, M. 2005. Geophysical monitoring of the subgrade with examples from Leominster. 8th Int. Conf. Railway Engineering, London.
Gunn, D A, Nelder, L M , Ghataora, G, Stirling, A B, Konstantelias, S, and Burrow, M. 2006. Geophysical properties of the railway subgrade at a site in Leominster. Jour. of the Permanent Way Institution.
Gunn, D A, Nelder, L M, Chambers, J E, Raines, M R, Reeves, H J, Boon, D, Pearson, S, Haslam, E, Carney, J, Stirling, A B, Ghataora, G, Burrow, M, Tinsley, R D, Tinsley, W H, and Tilden-Smith, R. 2006. Assessment of railway embankment stiffness using continuous surface waves. Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Railway Foundations, Birmingham, September 2006.
Nelder, L M, Gunn, D A, and Reeves, H. 2006. Investigation of the Geotechnical Properties of a Victorian Railway Embankment. Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Railway Foundations, Birmingham, September 2006.
Reeves, H J, Kessler, H, Freeborough, K, Lelliot, M, Gunn, DA, and Nelder, L M. 2005. Subgrade geology beneath railways in Manchester. 8th Int. Conf. Railway Engineering, London.
For further information contact: enquiries@bgs.ac.uk